1
10
2
-
https://humanities.gbcnv.edu/omeka/files/original/d7c3740725ff925c89e6d2ea3c6168b6.pdf
1f4a0fd958fd2fb82d03244ed7bf1ad0
PDF Text
Text
Discussions Rubric
Not
Done
In online classes,
students can respond
to discussions either
in writing or with a
video. The Quality of
Construction
category grade levels
distinguish between
these formats.
0 points
Content,
Relevance, and
Understanding
Students must
make an initial
response to my
discussion topics
by a Sunday
evening
deadline.
0 points
First Post Made
by Deadline
Level Three
Level Four
Structurally disorganized,
content is not developed
effectively, awkward
sentence structure, poor
grammar.
Written: Poor usage,
punctuation, and/or
spelling; uses informal
language, text messagetype spelling, and/or
abbreviations.
Video: Poor eye contact
with camera; unclear, too
fast, too quiet, and/or
muffled speech.
Reasonably effective
organization of content,
serviceable prose, numerous
errors of grammar.
Written: Numerous errors of
usage, punctuation, and/or
spelling; reads like a rough
draft. The text construction is
mainly formal containing few
abbreviations or instances of
text message-type spelling.
Video: Some eye contact with
camera; some speech is
unclear, too fast, too quiet,
and/or muffled.
Very effective
organization of content
and good grammar.
Written: Good usage and
punctuation, few spelling
mistakes; does not read
like a rough draft. The
reply contains interesting,
varied sentences or
paragraphs.
Video: Consistent eye
contact with camera, few
instances of unclear, too
fast, too quiet, and/or
muffled speech.
Meets criteria for "Level Three," plus
demonstrates superior grammatical
correctness and sense of personal style.
Effortless prose.
Written: Excellent usage and punctuation,
very few or no spelling mistakes. The
reply contains very well written sentences
or paragraphs.
Video: Excellent eye contact with camera,
very few or no instances of unclear, too
fast, too quiet, and/or muffled speech.
15 points
20 points
25 points
30 points
Simple content showing some
insight, depth, and is related to
the original post, question,
topic or concept. The
responses are too short for the
topic and may contain some
irrelevant or superficial
content. There may be some
personal comments or opinions
that may not be on task. Shows
some understanding.
Content in each response
shows insight, depth, and
is related to the original
post, question, topic or
concept. May contain
some irrelevant content.
Personal opinion is
expressed in an
appropriate style. Refers
to other students’ posts, if
applicable. Shows a good
depth of understanding
without excessive length.
Content in each response shows insight,
depth, and understanding, and is clearly
related to and fully addresses the original
post, question, topic or concept. Responses
are relevant with links or references to
supporting material such as websites,
images, and/or uploaded files, if
applicable. Personal opinion is expressed
in a relevant and appropriate style. Student
refers to other students’ posts and builds
on these, if applicable. The responses show
a high level and depth of understanding in
matters relating to and surrounding the
original post without excessive length.
26 points
34 points
42 points
50 points
Late or no
post.
0 points
Responded to
Two Other
Students’ Posts
by Deadline
Level Two
Simple content which
lacks insight, depth, or is
superficial. The responses
are short and frequently
irrelevant to the original
post, question, topic or
concept. Does not express
opinion clearly. Shows
little understanding.
Quality of
Construction
Level One
Missed
posts or
deadline.
0 points
First post made by first post deadline.
Students must respond to at least two other students’ posts by a
Wednesday afternoon deadline.
Responded to one other
student’s post by deadline.
5 points
10 points
Responded to two other students’ posts
by deadline.
10 points
Maximum points possible:
100 points
�
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Toolkit - Rubrics
Subject
The topic of the resource
Collections of rubrics and related material contributed by GBC Faculty
Description
An account of the resource
Collections of rubrics and related material contributed by GBC Faculty
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
GBC Faculty
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
GBC VHC
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Scott A. Gavorsky
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Original Format
The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data
PDF file
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Discussions Rubric with Commentary
Subject
The topic of the resource
A model rubric for online videoed discussions with commentary.
Description
An account of the resource
A model rubric for online videoed discussions with commentary by Kathy Schwandt.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Kathy Schwandt
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
GBC VHC
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
August 2014
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Scott A. Gavorsky
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
GBC
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
PDF file
Language
A language of the resource
English
Communication Skills
Discussions
Faculty
Meaning
rubric
Toolkit
video
-
https://humanities.gbcnv.edu/omeka/files/original/a5b61644e580beb37ac7a1023c356359.pdf
bfe745366d5082bd5b3751bf130a3ac3
PDF Text
Text
DISCUSSIONS POSTING RUBRIC (for History Survey Course)
Ratings
Criteria
Initial post responds Initial post responds Initial post responds Initial post answers
to all discussion
to all discussion
prompts and
to two of the
Initial post fails to
Post fails to engage with the
two of the discussion answer two of the
prompts, but fails to
prompts, answering
assigned readings.
supports arguments
one is unsupported
and supports them
support them with
only a single prompt
with specific
with evidence from
with evidence from
evidence from the
supported with
evidence drawn from the readings.
the readings, but
readings.
evidence from the
the readings.
ignores one of the
No post submitted.
specific discussion prompts or the
prompts, but at least discussion prompts
Pts
0 pts
INITIAL POST
300 words
(due by Thursdays at
11:59 pm)
1 pt
5 pts
6
readings.
3 pts
prompts.
6 pts
2 pts
4 pts
CITATIONS
(applies to both Initial
Post and Responses)
SPELLING /
GRAMMAR
(applies to both Initial
Post and Responses)
All evidence used in the initial post and the responses is properly Significant number of citations missing or incomplete.
No citations included
cited, including both source and page number.
with postings.
1 pt
2 pts
0 pts
A few minor grammatical and spelling errors that do not harm the Frequent or recurring grammatical or spelling errors.
Errors to the extent
meaning of the posts.
2
that understanding
1 pt
the post is difficult.
2 pts
2
0 pts
At least two responses which both engage Two responses, but
Two responses, but
Only one response
Only one response included,
No responses to
with the initial poster's responses in a
at least one fails to
neither response
included, which
which does not engage with the
colleagues' posts
substantial manner and are supported by
engage with the
engages with the
engages with the
initial poster's responses in
included.
RESPONSES
evidence from the readings.
initial poster's
initial poster in
initial poster's
substantive manner supported
150 words EACH
(two required by
Sundays at 11:59 pm)
responses with
substantive manner
responses in a
from the readings.
5 pts
support from the
supported from the
substantial manner
0 pts
5
1 pt
readings.
readings.
4 pts
and are supported by
3 pts
evidence from the
readings.
2 pts
Total Possible Points
15
�
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Toolkit - Rubrics
Subject
The topic of the resource
Collections of rubrics and related material contributed by GBC Faculty
Description
An account of the resource
Collections of rubrics and related material contributed by GBC Faculty
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
GBC Faculty
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
GBC VHC
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Scott A. Gavorsky
Document
Documents such as transcripts, pdf files, legal documents, letters, etc.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Discussions Posting Rubric for a History Survey Course
Subject
The topic of the resource
A grading rubric for discussion posts used for History survey courses.
Description
An account of the resource
This grading rubric for discussion posts was developed for History survey courses, although it is generic enough to be used for any types of courses. The rubric is set up based on a three-prompt discussion model, with an initial post and two required responses.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Scott A. Gavorsky
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Discussion Requirements for History Survey Courses [<a title="Discussion Requirements for History Survey Course" href="/omeka/exhibits/show/humanities-toolkit/item/124" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://humanities.gbcnv.edu/omeka/exhibits/show/humanities-toolkit/item/124</a>]
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
GBC Virtual Humanities Center
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
21 January 2016
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
All rights reserved. Use of any content only by express permission of Great Basin College © 2016
Relation
A related resource
<a title="Humanities Toolkit - Discussions" href="/omeka/exhibits/show/humanities-toolkit/discussions" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Humanities Toolkit / Discussions</a>
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
pdf; 1 page
Language
A language of the resource
English
Design
Design 2015-2017
Discussions
Faculty
In-Service
rubric
Toolkit